<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SoundCloud&#8217;s Terms and Conditions &#8211; Are they fair and reasonable ?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://productionadvice.co.uk/soundclouds-terms-conditions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://productionadvice.co.uk/soundclouds-terms-conditions/</link>
	<description>unlock the potential of your music</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 13:45:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://productionadvice.co.uk/soundclouds-terms-conditions/comment-page-1/#comment-2670</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 17:53:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://productionadvice.co.uk/?p=646#comment-2670</guid>
		<description>Yo, so I read that part about the grant and license, and I think its just a really long sentence that sounds scary at first, but really means that the artist would give Soundcloud the rights to share the music with other users. 
For example, if you made a song, you could expect royalties if it was played anywhere, but you would be waiving that right to Soundcloud as they literally distribute, display, stream, play, etc. your song to other users.
I dont think it means that you are giving up the rights to your music to Soundcloud.
The second part is also a long line about how you give every other user of Soundcloud the same rights! Which of course is necessary, because if another user is taking your music and sharing, displaying, distributing, etc. than it would be a big mess to track everything for royalties, and then would Soundcloud be paying royalties, and so on.

So, I think its ok.
Especially because if Soundcloud were to do anything with my music worth suing about, that would give me more publicity, which I&#039;m sure anyone who isnt already a famous pro artist would benefit from, right?
Using a song here and there doesnt generate a lot of royalties anyways. I have a song being played in Europe, and I get a few US dollars every month. Woopee.
And if someone in the future is gonna take my outake, demo version of a song and share it because of a loophole in this agreement, then so be it. No one is gonna be interested unless I&#039;m a huge artist, and even then it would be just for the true fans that wanna hear something like a backstage studio outake. I&#039;ll make loads of cash on my super-polished radio version, and you can do anything you want with my demos as I retire in luxury.
And no ones gonna beat me to the punch with my own music, cuz if they do, well then thank you very much partner, I&#039;ll take it from here, cuz I&#039;m the real deal, and it only gets better boom batta my pockets gettin fatta.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yo, so I read that part about the grant and license, and I think its just a really long sentence that sounds scary at first, but really means that the artist would give Soundcloud the rights to share the music with other users.<br />
For example, if you made a song, you could expect royalties if it was played anywhere, but you would be waiving that right to Soundcloud as they literally distribute, display, stream, play, etc. your song to other users.<br />
I dont think it means that you are giving up the rights to your music to Soundcloud.<br />
The second part is also a long line about how you give every other user of Soundcloud the same rights! Which of course is necessary, because if another user is taking your music and sharing, displaying, distributing, etc. than it would be a big mess to track everything for royalties, and then would Soundcloud be paying royalties, and so on.</p>
<p>So, I think its ok.<br />
Especially because if Soundcloud were to do anything with my music worth suing about, that would give me more publicity, which I&#8217;m sure anyone who isnt already a famous pro artist would benefit from, right?<br />
Using a song here and there doesnt generate a lot of royalties anyways. I have a song being played in Europe, and I get a few US dollars every month. Woopee.<br />
And if someone in the future is gonna take my outake, demo version of a song and share it because of a loophole in this agreement, then so be it. No one is gonna be interested unless I&#8217;m a huge artist, and even then it would be just for the true fans that wanna hear something like a backstage studio outake. I&#8217;ll make loads of cash on my super-polished radio version, and you can do anything you want with my demos as I retire in luxury.<br />
And no ones gonna beat me to the punch with my own music, cuz if they do, well then thank you very much partner, I&#8217;ll take it from here, cuz I&#8217;m the real deal, and it only gets better boom batta my pockets gettin fatta.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Citizen X</title>
		<link>http://productionadvice.co.uk/soundclouds-terms-conditions/comment-page-1/#comment-2594</link>
		<dc:creator>Citizen X</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 07:19:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://productionadvice.co.uk/?p=646#comment-2594</guid>
		<description>I would not sign up with any service that is &quot;perpetual&quot; and &quot;irrevocable&quot;. 

If elsewhere within the terms there is the possibility to delete one&#039;s account, this contradicts the &quot;perpetual&quot; and &quot;irrevocable&quot; nature of the license. So which terms to believe?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would not sign up with any service that is &#8220;perpetual&#8221; and &#8220;irrevocable&#8221;. </p>
<p>If elsewhere within the terms there is the possibility to delete one&#8217;s account, this contradicts the &#8220;perpetual&#8221; and &#8220;irrevocable&#8221; nature of the license. So which terms to believe?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://productionadvice.co.uk/soundclouds-terms-conditions/comment-page-1/#comment-2349</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 13:29:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://productionadvice.co.uk/?p=646#comment-2349</guid>
		<description>I just found out about soundcloud.

It looked interesting enough to sign up.  Until I hit their terms and conditions.

My intellectual property is important to me.

They might &quot;appear to protect my ownership&quot; however they are in fact saying &quot;While you own it, we own it too when its on our systems&quot;.

I Say... Bollocks to that..

I clicked the cancel button on the sign up page and will not be returning to soundcloud unless those clauses are dramatically changed.. i.e probably never.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just found out about soundcloud.</p>
<p>It looked interesting enough to sign up.  Until I hit their terms and conditions.</p>
<p>My intellectual property is important to me.</p>
<p>They might &#8220;appear to protect my ownership&#8221; however they are in fact saying &#8220;While you own it, we own it too when its on our systems&#8221;.</p>
<p>I Say&#8230; Bollocks to that..</p>
<p>I clicked the cancel button on the sign up page and will not be returning to soundcloud unless those clauses are dramatically changed.. i.e probably never.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Shepherd</title>
		<link>http://productionadvice.co.uk/soundclouds-terms-conditions/comment-page-1/#comment-1602</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Shepherd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 22:28:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://productionadvice.co.uk/?p=646#comment-1602</guid>
		<description>I completely agree - the question is, who would win the lawsuit ?

I&#039;m hardly an expert, but the way I read it, Soundcloud have covered themselves - and that&#039;s the question that still hangs in the air. It&#039;s five months since I wrote that post, and Soundcloud haven&#039;t updated their terms and conditions yet. As I say in the post, I have no doubt they have only good intentions - but I&#039;m also pretty sure that if someone at Soundcloud misused the power the T&amp;C give them, there would be nothing anyone else could do about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I completely agree &#8211; the question is, who would win the lawsuit ?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m hardly an expert, but the way I read it, Soundcloud have covered themselves &#8211; and that&#8217;s the question that still hangs in the air. It&#8217;s five months since I wrote that post, and Soundcloud haven&#8217;t updated their terms and conditions yet. As I say in the post, I have no doubt they have only good intentions &#8211; but I&#8217;m also pretty sure that if someone at Soundcloud misused the power the T&amp;C give them, there would be nothing anyone else could do about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Inofaith</title>
		<link>http://productionadvice.co.uk/soundclouds-terms-conditions/comment-page-1/#comment-1600</link>
		<dc:creator>Inofaith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 21:16:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://productionadvice.co.uk/?p=646#comment-1600</guid>
		<description>Well I more ore less interpret the T&amp;C as enought rights for them to move the music within their realm of the site.
They are hosting it for you so they need some rights to handle your music.

In short for me it says they can display the music in any way anywhere anyhow... but that doesn&#039;t mean some person is going to play your track somewhere (outside of the website) and take credit for it.

They let the creator decide where soundcloud can move/show the content.

Compare it to giving an employer of your store a bank card to go and fetch some supplies for your company. You give them some rights within your company to handle confidential matters.
But the moment the employer takes off his uniform and still uses the bank card.. its wrong. It wasn&#039;t meant to go that way. And I don&#039;t think soundcloud will take off their uniform and handle the music anywhere outside of the website.

So many artist use it now, they could get a lot of lawsuits if they would even try and run with copyrighted material</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I more ore less interpret the T&amp;C as enought rights for them to move the music within their realm of the site.<br />
They are hosting it for you so they need some rights to handle your music.</p>
<p>In short for me it says they can display the music in any way anywhere anyhow&#8230; but that doesn&#8217;t mean some person is going to play your track somewhere (outside of the website) and take credit for it.</p>
<p>They let the creator decide where soundcloud can move/show the content.</p>
<p>Compare it to giving an employer of your store a bank card to go and fetch some supplies for your company. You give them some rights within your company to handle confidential matters.<br />
But the moment the employer takes off his uniform and still uses the bank card.. its wrong. It wasn&#8217;t meant to go that way. And I don&#8217;t think soundcloud will take off their uniform and handle the music anywhere outside of the website.</p>
<p>So many artist use it now, they could get a lot of lawsuits if they would even try and run with copyrighted material</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J.Salazar Allelos music</title>
		<link>http://productionadvice.co.uk/soundclouds-terms-conditions/comment-page-1/#comment-566</link>
		<dc:creator>J.Salazar Allelos music</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 03:21:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://productionadvice.co.uk/?p=646#comment-566</guid>
		<description>First, i feel that any user of any web based platform to promote &#039;their&#039; music, should fully understand it will be passed around...possibly leached in some form...etc. Second, its 2009 and the fact that artist with a PC can sit in their home and rail high quality music is just brilliant. &#039;sharing&#039;, as ive taken to calling it is whats music is all about anyway. We just do it to a much bigger audience and yea for us. :) Im very much looking forward to any and all advancement in this area.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, i feel that any user of any web based platform to promote &#8216;their&#8217; music, should fully understand it will be passed around&#8230;possibly leached in some form&#8230;etc. Second, its 2009 and the fact that artist with a PC can sit in their home and rail high quality music is just brilliant. &#8217;sharing&#8217;, as ive taken to calling it is whats music is all about anyway. We just do it to a much bigger audience and yea for us. <img src='http://productionadvice.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  Im very much looking forward to any and all advancement in this area.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://productionadvice.co.uk/soundclouds-terms-conditions/comment-page-1/#comment-465</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 22:36:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://productionadvice.co.uk/?p=646#comment-465</guid>
		<description>Comparing to Bandcamp&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://bandcamp.com/terms_of_use&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Terms Of Use&lt;/a&gt; is interesting, Chuck - great question. I hadn&#039;t signed up so I hadn&#039;t tried it. They actually have a clause which is very similar, but it explicitly includes the explanation that the Rights are for the purpose of implementing BandCamp&#039;s service.

I doubt whether there is legally much difference between the two, but to a new visitor BandCamp&#039;s Terms seem much more reasonable.

I think SoundCloud should make their T&amp;C closer to BandCamp&#039;s, but I think &lt;strong&gt;both&lt;/strong&gt; companies, and all others with this type of user agreement, should undertake within the T&amp;C to only share music as specifically authorised by the user, and to require the same of their successor(s) if any.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comparing to Bandcamp&#8217;s <a href="http://bandcamp.com/terms_of_use" rel="nofollow">Terms Of Use</a> is interesting, Chuck &#8211; great question. I hadn&#8217;t signed up so I hadn&#8217;t tried it. They actually have a clause which is very similar, but it explicitly includes the explanation that the Rights are for the purpose of implementing BandCamp&#8217;s service.</p>
<p>I doubt whether there is legally much difference between the two, but to a new visitor BandCamp&#8217;s Terms seem much more reasonable.</p>
<p>I think SoundCloud should make their T&#038;C closer to BandCamp&#8217;s, but I think <strong>both</strong> companies, and all others with this type of user agreement, should undertake within the T&#038;C to only share music as specifically authorised by the user, and to require the same of their successor(s) if any.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Haynes</title>
		<link>http://productionadvice.co.uk/soundclouds-terms-conditions/comment-page-1/#comment-455</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Haynes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 09:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://productionadvice.co.uk/?p=646#comment-455</guid>
		<description>Hi all, Dave from SoundCloud here. It&#039;s great to see Ian using the dropbox. 

We&#039;re super busy building the most kick-ass service possible for musicians and audio professionals but we&#039;re hoping to find time to tweak any terms in the T&amp;C&#039;s that anyone might be concerned about. Or humanise them slightly so that they can&#039;t be misinterpreted. 

@chuck SoundCloud is used for content that you own or have the rights to use. It could be anything: your band&#039;s music, the catalogue of a label you run, parts to a track you are collaborating on, an interview with somebody or even a field-recording. Many people are using SoundCloud privately to collaborate on or send contacts their music but it&#039;s also great for hosting your music and then sending to Myspace, Facebook or Twitter.

Hope that helps...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi all, Dave from SoundCloud here. It&#8217;s great to see Ian using the dropbox. </p>
<p>We&#8217;re super busy building the most kick-ass service possible for musicians and audio professionals but we&#8217;re hoping to find time to tweak any terms in the T&amp;C&#8217;s that anyone might be concerned about. Or humanise them slightly so that they can&#8217;t be misinterpreted. </p>
<p>@chuck SoundCloud is used for content that you own or have the rights to use. It could be anything: your band&#8217;s music, the catalogue of a label you run, parts to a track you are collaborating on, an interview with somebody or even a field-recording. Many people are using SoundCloud privately to collaborate on or send contacts their music but it&#8217;s also great for hosting your music and then sending to Myspace, Facebook or Twitter.</p>
<p>Hope that helps&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chuck</title>
		<link>http://productionadvice.co.uk/soundclouds-terms-conditions/comment-page-1/#comment-454</link>
		<dc:creator>chuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 21:56:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://productionadvice.co.uk/?p=646#comment-454</guid>
		<description>How would you say Soundcloud&#039;s T&amp;C compare with those of Bandcamp?  Or for that matter, perhaps they don&#039;t compare well because the sites have different purposes in mind?  I still haven&#039;t completely even figured out what SoundCloud is supposed to be /for/ exactly:

* put my band&#039;s music up where people can download it
* put my band&#039;s music up to stream to widgets
* put my personal music collection up so I can listen to it
  elsewhere besides my home computer (because I work with a
  computer all day and still don&#039;t have an iPod)
* put my personal music collection up for my friends to
  &lt;strike&gt;steal&lt;/strike&gt; download</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How would you say Soundcloud&#8217;s T&amp;C compare with those of Bandcamp?  Or for that matter, perhaps they don&#8217;t compare well because the sites have different purposes in mind?  I still haven&#8217;t completely even figured out what SoundCloud is supposed to be /for/ exactly:</p>
<p>* put my band&#8217;s music up where people can download it<br />
* put my band&#8217;s music up to stream to widgets<br />
* put my personal music collection up so I can listen to it<br />
  elsewhere besides my home computer (because I work with a<br />
  computer all day and still don&#8217;t have an iPod)<br />
* put my personal music collection up for my friends to<br />
  <strike>steal</strike> download</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://productionadvice.co.uk/soundclouds-terms-conditions/comment-page-1/#comment-451</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 15:39:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://productionadvice.co.uk/?p=646#comment-451</guid>
		<description>I guess ultimately that&#039;s true. But they &lt;em&gt;don&#039;t&lt;/em&gt; say they won&#039;t share your files - not in the Terms and Conditions, anyway, which is the legally binding part of the site. Certainly if they sold the service at some future point (I&#039;m not saying they would, but IF) then the new owners wouldn&#039;t be under obligation to honour anything not in the T&amp;C.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess ultimately that&#8217;s true. But they <em>don&#8217;t</em> say they won&#8217;t share your files &#8211; not in the Terms and Conditions, anyway, which is the legally binding part of the site. Certainly if they sold the service at some future point (I&#8217;m not saying they would, but IF) then the new owners wouldn&#8217;t be under obligation to honour anything not in the T&#038;C.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.416 seconds -->
<!-- Cached page served by WP-Cache -->
