<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 7 crucial EQ bands to help balance your mix</title>
	<atom:link href="http://productionadvice.co.uk/using-eq/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://productionadvice.co.uk/using-eq/</link>
	<description>make your music sound great</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 23:40:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Shepherd</title>
		<link>http://productionadvice.co.uk/using-eq/comment-page-1/#comment-7151</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Shepherd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 12:29:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://productionadvice.co.uk/?p=1331#comment-7151</guid>
		<description>Hi Ivan,

Whichever sounds best :-)

A little more helpfully, I would always opt to try cutting first, and see how it sounds, so if one is a boost and one is a cut - go for that one first. If you can give me a specific example I might be able to be more helpful. Possibly pan them to different parts of the mix, to stop them clashing ?

Ian</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ivan,</p>
<p>Whichever sounds best <img src='http://productionadvice.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>A little more helpfully, I would always opt to try cutting first, and see how it sounds, so if one is a boost and one is a cut &#8211; go for that one first. If you can give me a specific example I might be able to be more helpful. Possibly pan them to different parts of the mix, to stop them clashing ?</p>
<p>Ian</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ivan</title>
		<link>http://productionadvice.co.uk/using-eq/comment-page-1/#comment-7070</link>
		<dc:creator>Ivan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 08:40:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://productionadvice.co.uk/?p=1331#comment-7070</guid>
		<description>What happens when you get two sounds, with close to identical frequencies? Which one do you cut or boost?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What happens when you get two sounds, with close to identical frequencies? Which one do you cut or boost?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Shepherd</title>
		<link>http://productionadvice.co.uk/using-eq/comment-page-1/#comment-5133</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Shepherd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2011 14:43:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://productionadvice.co.uk/?p=1331#comment-5133</guid>
		<description>Hello, and thanks for the question !

Yes - I automate EQ sometimes - not so much on things like drums, but certainly guitars, vocals etc. The most common example for me is probably solos, for example. I always enjoy watching the fader automations on a big desk :-) You need to be careful not to make the changes too large, and reduce the contrast between sections too much, but it can certainly be a powerful technique.

Ian</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, and thanks for the question !</p>
<p>Yes &#8211; I automate EQ sometimes &#8211; not so much on things like drums, but certainly guitars, vocals etc. The most common example for me is probably solos, for example. I always enjoy watching the fader automations on a big desk <img src='http://productionadvice.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  You need to be careful not to make the changes too large, and reduce the contrast between sections too much, but it can certainly be a powerful technique.</p>
<p>Ian</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: navarre</title>
		<link>http://productionadvice.co.uk/using-eq/comment-page-1/#comment-5132</link>
		<dc:creator>navarre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2011 01:46:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://productionadvice.co.uk/?p=1331#comment-5132</guid>
		<description>Does anyone ever automate eq parameters? As you mention, a kick can sound beautifully EQ&#039;s by itself, but in a mix it may muddy things up. But what happens during breakdowns where various elements come into and out of the mix? Won&#039;t certain instruments sound awkward without their frequency complements there to fill in a given frequency range? Therefore, does it seem reasonable to automate a given EQ db setting to change with the arrangement of the song? This is something I&#039;ve always wondered. Really helpful post.

Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone ever automate eq parameters? As you mention, a kick can sound beautifully EQ&#8217;s by itself, but in a mix it may muddy things up. But what happens during breakdowns where various elements come into and out of the mix? Won&#8217;t certain instruments sound awkward without their frequency complements there to fill in a given frequency range? Therefore, does it seem reasonable to automate a given EQ db setting to change with the arrangement of the song? This is something I&#8217;ve always wondered. Really helpful post.</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john wronski</title>
		<link>http://productionadvice.co.uk/using-eq/comment-page-1/#comment-4694</link>
		<dc:creator>john wronski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 05:46:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://productionadvice.co.uk/?p=1331#comment-4694</guid>
		<description>wow --- extremely use full  thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow &#8212; extremely use full  thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Shepherd</title>
		<link>http://productionadvice.co.uk/using-eq/comment-page-1/#comment-4322</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Shepherd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 23:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://productionadvice.co.uk/?p=1331#comment-4322</guid>
		<description>Thanks, glad you like it ! Check out the &quot;Best Of&quot;... http://productionadvice.co.uk/best-of-mixing/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, glad you like it ! Check out the &#8220;Best Of&#8221;&#8230; <a href="http://productionadvice.co.uk/best-of-mixing/" rel="nofollow">http://productionadvice.co.uk/best-of-mixing/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Salad</title>
		<link>http://productionadvice.co.uk/using-eq/comment-page-1/#comment-4321</link>
		<dc:creator>Salad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 23:18:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://productionadvice.co.uk/?p=1331#comment-4321</guid>
		<description>Hugely useful info, one or two little nuggets I&#039;m itching to play around with - thanks! Great site, look forward to future posts.. Cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hugely useful info, one or two little nuggets I&#8217;m itching to play around with &#8211; thanks! Great site, look forward to future posts.. Cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://productionadvice.co.uk/using-eq/comment-page-1/#comment-4091</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2011 12:07:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://productionadvice.co.uk/?p=1331#comment-4091</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s my favorite EQ trick of all:
Let&#039;s say that your snare is making this overtone that you do not care for.  Like a combo between a boing and a resonance sound.  This undesired sound (if you listen very carefully) makes a note or very close to a note.  Hum that note to yourself, then walk over to the piano/keyboard and go up and down the keys until you find the note and octave that you&#039;re humming.  Ok, stay with me:
Now that you know which note it is, you look it up on a &quot;musical note frequency chart&quot; like this one:
http://www.intmath.com/trigonometric-graphs/music.php
It tells you the EXACT frequency of your offending overtone/ring on your snare (or whatever sound source you apply this to) and then you simply dip with a very sharp Q that frequency on the snare drum, and that annoying tone has magically disappeared.
If your offending tone is in between two notes, then you might need to sweep between the notes&#039; respective frequencies to find the problem.
What makes this so great is that you can get rid of your problem without the rest of the track suffering from too much dip.
I got this tip from a Bob Katz video here, and it&#039;s worked wonders for me:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=evJo5_qt6mY</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s my favorite EQ trick of all:<br />
Let&#8217;s say that your snare is making this overtone that you do not care for.  Like a combo between a boing and a resonance sound.  This undesired sound (if you listen very carefully) makes a note or very close to a note.  Hum that note to yourself, then walk over to the piano/keyboard and go up and down the keys until you find the note and octave that you&#8217;re humming.  Ok, stay with me:<br />
Now that you know which note it is, you look it up on a &#8220;musical note frequency chart&#8221; like this one:<br />
<a href="http://www.intmath.com/trigonometric-graphs/music.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.intmath.com/trigonometric-graphs/music.php</a><br />
It tells you the EXACT frequency of your offending overtone/ring on your snare (or whatever sound source you apply this to) and then you simply dip with a very sharp Q that frequency on the snare drum, and that annoying tone has magically disappeared.<br />
If your offending tone is in between two notes, then you might need to sweep between the notes&#8217; respective frequencies to find the problem.<br />
What makes this so great is that you can get rid of your problem without the rest of the track suffering from too much dip.<br />
I got this tip from a Bob Katz video here, and it&#8217;s worked wonders for me:<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=evJo5_qt6mY" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=evJo5_qt6mY</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Shepherd</title>
		<link>http://productionadvice.co.uk/using-eq/comment-page-1/#comment-3450</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Shepherd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2011 12:43:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://productionadvice.co.uk/?p=1331#comment-3450</guid>
		<description>Thanks Jake, that&#039;s a compliment I&#039;ve never been paid before ! It was a little scary at first because here in the UK &quot;pants&quot; means underwear... but I see you&#039;re from over the pond so that&#039;s cool :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Jake, that&#8217;s a compliment I&#8217;ve never been paid before ! It was a little scary at first because here in the UK &#8220;pants&#8221; means underwear&#8230; but I see you&#8217;re from over the pond so that&#8217;s cool <img src='http://productionadvice.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake</title>
		<link>http://productionadvice.co.uk/using-eq/comment-page-1/#comment-3439</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2011 17:39:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://productionadvice.co.uk/?p=1331#comment-3439</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this. All of your articles have made me take my pants off in celebration. I have since put them back on and am eager to get at some of my mixes. 
Cheers,
Jake</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this. All of your articles have made me take my pants off in celebration. I have since put them back on and am eager to get at some of my mixes.<br />
Cheers,<br />
Jake</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Served from: productionadvice.co.uk @ 2012-05-21 19:31:15 by W3 Total Cache -->
