<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why I was wrong about Spotify</title>
	<atom:link href="http://productionadvice.co.uk/wrong-about-spotify/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://productionadvice.co.uk/wrong-about-spotify/</link>
	<description>make your music sound great</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 13:31:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jyrki</title>
		<link>http://productionadvice.co.uk/wrong-about-spotify/comment-page-1/#comment-5596</link>
		<dc:creator>Jyrki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 16:01:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://productionadvice.co.uk/?p=1505#comment-5596</guid>
		<description>I have a Sonos system and I have been generally pleased with the Spotify service. I leave all normalisation settings off because I like to avoid any additional processing to the audio stream done by the playback system.

The implementation of the Spotify in Sonos system differs from the normal way of running the Spotify program on PC or mobile phone. In Sonos you can&#039;t control the normalisation setting at all. I asked about this limiter issue from Sonos and Spotify.

Spotify replied that they are not manipulating the ogg files in any way and they are as is. Sonos claims that they are also streaming the ogg files as they are from Spotify. So this alleged limiter is either implemented at the user&#039;s PC during the ogg vorbis decompression or Spotify is manipulating the audio files during the ogg vorbis file creation. If the limiter is applied at the decompression it could be that the Sonos system doesn&#039;t apply it.

What comes to Neal Mathews comment on the limiting: One can never be sure about the source material that has been provided to Spotify by the record companies. Many times there can be several versions of the same record available in Spotify. Typically the newest remastered versions suffer from the loudness war type of limiting. Quite often the remastered version is also the only one available in Spotify. You can&#039;t compare the audio files unless you are sure that the originals are the same.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a Sonos system and I have been generally pleased with the Spotify service. I leave all normalisation settings off because I like to avoid any additional processing to the audio stream done by the playback system.</p>
<p>The implementation of the Spotify in Sonos system differs from the normal way of running the Spotify program on PC or mobile phone. In Sonos you can&#8217;t control the normalisation setting at all. I asked about this limiter issue from Sonos and Spotify.</p>
<p>Spotify replied that they are not manipulating the ogg files in any way and they are as is. Sonos claims that they are also streaming the ogg files as they are from Spotify. So this alleged limiter is either implemented at the user&#8217;s PC during the ogg vorbis decompression or Spotify is manipulating the audio files during the ogg vorbis file creation. If the limiter is applied at the decompression it could be that the Sonos system doesn&#8217;t apply it.</p>
<p>What comes to Neal Mathews comment on the limiting: One can never be sure about the source material that has been provided to Spotify by the record companies. Many times there can be several versions of the same record available in Spotify. Typically the newest remastered versions suffer from the loudness war type of limiting. Quite often the remastered version is also the only one available in Spotify. You can&#8217;t compare the audio files unless you are sure that the originals are the same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neal Matthews</title>
		<link>http://productionadvice.co.uk/wrong-about-spotify/comment-page-1/#comment-4673</link>
		<dc:creator>Neal Matthews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 17:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://productionadvice.co.uk/?p=1505#comment-4673</guid>
		<description>I wanted to love Spotify; really I did. But it is painfully obvious that the limiter is present at all times, and it is not graceful at all. (and despite other comments, by the way, this has NOTHING to do MP3 or Ogg Vorbis compressions algorithms). Try this track (It&#039;s live Tower of Power):
http://open.spotify.com/track/4WINZx2HCqtYoyMhLagUNM

Every time the horns stab, the limiter pumps horribly. Not just &quot;yeah , if I pay attention, I can hear it&quot;. Yes, this is an extreme example because of the dynamic range of this track, but this is just pathetic. Yes, I&#039;m an audio engineer, but I really do understand enough to make allowances as to what to expect from a streaming audio service. Pandora does a much better job of limiting/normalization dealing with the exact same issues.

Bottom line: Spotify could do a MUCH better job with the implementation of necessary audio dynamics, and it is needlessly damaging the listenability of their service. So to your question: &quot;Is limiting high-level decoded audio the right thing for Spotify to do ?&quot; my answer would be... Absolutely not, at least with the particular settings they are using.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wanted to love Spotify; really I did. But it is painfully obvious that the limiter is present at all times, and it is not graceful at all. (and despite other comments, by the way, this has NOTHING to do MP3 or Ogg Vorbis compressions algorithms). Try this track (It&#8217;s live Tower of Power):<br />
<a href="http://open.spotify.com/track/4WINZx2HCqtYoyMhLagUNM" rel="nofollow">http://open.spotify.com/track/4WINZx2HCqtYoyMhLagUNM</a></p>
<p>Every time the horns stab, the limiter pumps horribly. Not just &#8220;yeah , if I pay attention, I can hear it&#8221;. Yes, this is an extreme example because of the dynamic range of this track, but this is just pathetic. Yes, I&#8217;m an audio engineer, but I really do understand enough to make allowances as to what to expect from a streaming audio service. Pandora does a much better job of limiting/normalization dealing with the exact same issues.</p>
<p>Bottom line: Spotify could do a MUCH better job with the implementation of necessary audio dynamics, and it is needlessly damaging the listenability of their service. So to your question: &#8220;Is limiting high-level decoded audio the right thing for Spotify to do ?&#8221; my answer would be&#8230; Absolutely not, at least with the particular settings they are using.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Togo Dan</title>
		<link>http://productionadvice.co.uk/wrong-about-spotify/comment-page-1/#comment-2743</link>
		<dc:creator>Togo Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 13:07:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://productionadvice.co.uk/?p=1505#comment-2743</guid>
		<description>Spotify just sounds like a good quality FM radio station to me, no better or worse than that. CD&#039;s and even Apple store aac plus 256k downloads are noticeably better sound quality wise...just my humble opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spotify just sounds like a good quality FM radio station to me, no better or worse than that. CD&#8217;s and even Apple store aac plus 256k downloads are noticeably better sound quality wise&#8230;just my humble opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Shepherd</title>
		<link>http://productionadvice.co.uk/wrong-about-spotify/comment-page-1/#comment-2739</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Shepherd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 23:42:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://productionadvice.co.uk/?p=1505#comment-2739</guid>
		<description>You may be hearing the lossy compression (Ogg Vorbis) or it may be the fact that Spotify doesn&#039;t use dither when normalisation is on... but that&#039;s a whole other blog post !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You may be hearing the lossy compression (Ogg Vorbis) or it may be the fact that Spotify doesn&#8217;t use dither when normalisation is on&#8230; but that&#8217;s a whole other blog post !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sorcerer</title>
		<link>http://productionadvice.co.uk/wrong-about-spotify/comment-page-1/#comment-2737</link>
		<dc:creator>Sorcerer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 07:18:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://productionadvice.co.uk/?p=1505#comment-2737</guid>
		<description>Yet, there is something weird about the way tracks in Spotify sound!

For some reason high frequencies (like made by hi-hats, or in human voices when pronouncing the letter s) sound slightly distorted. It actually sounds a tiny bit jittery (as if the hi-hat sound is mixed with static), though it&#039;s clearly a different kind of distortion than clock-jitter: much less intrusive.

Lower frequencies sound a tiny bit less accurate than on the cd version. Can&#039;t put my finger on that but it just feels a little less &quot;tight&quot;.

All was tested with some Michael Jackson tracks, because they&#039;re mastered pretty well (unlike most music these days) and contain lots of high frequencies. I notice it on all Spotify music and hope it&#039;s a processing thing in the client that they can solve. Also it was tested by connecting my pc to my av-receiver by hdmi (set to 44100 Hz 16-bit pcm sampling). Cd&#039;s were played by the same pc so all hardware was 100% equal.

Conclusion:
Spotify is a great service and sounds great. My audio-setup allows for great detail in the audio and this is something Spotify can&#039;t deliver. I&#039;m pretty confident you won&#039;t be able to hear the difference on a set of pc-speakers or even a normal consumer music system though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yet, there is something weird about the way tracks in Spotify sound!</p>
<p>For some reason high frequencies (like made by hi-hats, or in human voices when pronouncing the letter s) sound slightly distorted. It actually sounds a tiny bit jittery (as if the hi-hat sound is mixed with static), though it&#8217;s clearly a different kind of distortion than clock-jitter: much less intrusive.</p>
<p>Lower frequencies sound a tiny bit less accurate than on the cd version. Can&#8217;t put my finger on that but it just feels a little less &#8220;tight&#8221;.</p>
<p>All was tested with some Michael Jackson tracks, because they&#8217;re mastered pretty well (unlike most music these days) and contain lots of high frequencies. I notice it on all Spotify music and hope it&#8217;s a processing thing in the client that they can solve. Also it was tested by connecting my pc to my av-receiver by hdmi (set to 44100 Hz 16-bit pcm sampling). Cd&#8217;s were played by the same pc so all hardware was 100% equal.</p>
<p>Conclusion:<br />
Spotify is a great service and sounds great. My audio-setup allows for great detail in the audio and this is something Spotify can&#8217;t deliver. I&#8217;m pretty confident you won&#8217;t be able to hear the difference on a set of pc-speakers or even a normal consumer music system though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Shepherd</title>
		<link>http://productionadvice.co.uk/wrong-about-spotify/comment-page-1/#comment-2106</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Shepherd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 13:33:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://productionadvice.co.uk/?p=1505#comment-2106</guid>
		<description>@ Thomas - It depends how you listen ! If it&#039;s mainly albums, then Yes, by all means switch normalisation off - because you can set the level and listen with the original dynamics. But lots of people listen to players like this in &quot;Shuffle&quot;, &quot;Scrobble&quot; or &quot;Radio&quot; mode, where tracks can come in from almost any album, so the levels may jump around a lot. In this case personally I want normalisation.

I should also qualify what I said in that reply, actually - if you&#039;re listening to a track and it&#039;s louder with normalisation on, then you *may* be hearing Spotify&#039;s limiter working, and it *may* sound better with normalisation off - or, there may have been plenty of headroom in the original track, in which case there will be no limiting. And, the effect of the limiter will be quite mild on most music, anyway.

Finally, if you listen to lots of modern stuff, where the levels are &quot;up there&quot; already, then personally I don&#039;t want to hear another limiter working, even just to deal with overlevels in the decoded stream, so again I would leave normalisation on...

This stuff is never simple !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Thomas &#8211; It depends how you listen ! If it&#8217;s mainly albums, then Yes, by all means switch normalisation off &#8211; because you can set the level and listen with the original dynamics. But lots of people listen to players like this in &#8220;Shuffle&#8221;, &#8220;Scrobble&#8221; or &#8220;Radio&#8221; mode, where tracks can come in from almost any album, so the levels may jump around a lot. In this case personally I want normalisation.</p>
<p>I should also qualify what I said in that reply, actually &#8211; if you&#8217;re listening to a track and it&#8217;s louder with normalisation on, then you *may* be hearing Spotify&#8217;s limiter working, and it *may* sound better with normalisation off &#8211; or, there may have been plenty of headroom in the original track, in which case there will be no limiting. And, the effect of the limiter will be quite mild on most music, anyway.</p>
<p>Finally, if you listen to lots of modern stuff, where the levels are &#8220;up there&#8221; already, then personally I don&#8217;t want to hear another limiter working, even just to deal with overlevels in the decoded stream, so again I would leave normalisation on&#8230;</p>
<p>This stuff is never simple !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://productionadvice.co.uk/wrong-about-spotify/comment-page-1/#comment-2080</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 14:42:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://productionadvice.co.uk/?p=1505#comment-2080</guid>
		<description>Interesting answaer you give Erik. If dynamic tracks sound better with normalization off and nomalization only turns the level down on other tracks(no difference) the obvious choice to me seems to turn normalization off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting answaer you give Erik. If dynamic tracks sound better with normalization off and nomalization only turns the level down on other tracks(no difference) the obvious choice to me seems to turn normalization off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Shepherd</title>
		<link>http://productionadvice.co.uk/wrong-about-spotify/comment-page-1/#comment-1421</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Shepherd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 08:35:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://productionadvice.co.uk/?p=1505#comment-1421</guid>
		<description>@Jens - Yes, I know about the level lift, but this only has an effect for tracks that are quiet/dynamic to begin with. So for example, the Coldplay track I used as an example in my original post is &lt;em&gt;reduced&lt;/em&gt; by approx 3dB overall, even with the &quot;boost&quot; taken into account. So tracks with a &lt;a href=&quot;http://productionadvice.co.uk/how-to-avoid-over-compressing-your-mix/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;DR10&lt;/a&gt; or less will be reduced, and not processed further.

Bottom line - if the track sounds quieter with normalisation on, it has NOT had extra limiting or processing.

@VIOZ - Spotify applies the gain change, then passes the audio to the computer for playback. So it changes the data, but only a gain reduction. Strict ReplayGain adjustments involve quite a big reduction, which may cause the differences you&#039;re hearing - but, it&#039;s important to match the level again for any comparisons ! As soon as you compare two things at different playback levels, you can&#039;t make accurate comparisons. Do the tracks still sound flat/lifeless if you turn them back up again ?

@Erik - There are two possibilities:

1 - If the tracks get louder with normalisation ON, then you are hearing the limiter working on a dynamic track, and yes - in this case they will sound better with normalisation off.

2 - If the tracks get &lt;em&gt;quieter&lt;/em&gt; with normalisation on, then I disagree - the limiter will not change the sound  at all because all Spotify does is turn the level down. No listening needed, I&#039;ve seen the raw data to prove it, now. 

If you prefer the non-normalised sound &lt;em&gt;when level-matched to the normalised version&lt;/em&gt;, it&#039;s just because you prefer the limiting of the higher level level.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jens &#8211; Yes, I know about the level lift, but this only has an effect for tracks that are quiet/dynamic to begin with. So for example, the Coldplay track I used as an example in my original post is <em>reduced</em> by approx 3dB overall, even with the &#8220;boost&#8221; taken into account. So tracks with a <a href="http://productionadvice.co.uk/how-to-avoid-over-compressing-your-mix/" rel="nofollow">DR10</a> or less will be reduced, and not processed further.</p>
<p>Bottom line &#8211; if the track sounds quieter with normalisation on, it has NOT had extra limiting or processing.</p>
<p>@VIOZ &#8211; Spotify applies the gain change, then passes the audio to the computer for playback. So it changes the data, but only a gain reduction. Strict ReplayGain adjustments involve quite a big reduction, which may cause the differences you&#8217;re hearing &#8211; but, it&#8217;s important to match the level again for any comparisons ! As soon as you compare two things at different playback levels, you can&#8217;t make accurate comparisons. Do the tracks still sound flat/lifeless if you turn them back up again ?</p>
<p>@Erik &#8211; There are two possibilities:</p>
<p>1 &#8211; If the tracks get louder with normalisation ON, then you are hearing the limiter working on a dynamic track, and yes &#8211; in this case they will sound better with normalisation off.</p>
<p>2 &#8211; If the tracks get <em>quieter</em> with normalisation on, then I disagree &#8211; the limiter will not change the sound  at all because all Spotify does is turn the level down. No listening needed, I&#8217;ve seen the raw data to prove it, now. </p>
<p>If you prefer the non-normalised sound <em>when level-matched to the normalised version</em>, it&#8217;s just because you prefer the limiting of the higher level level.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik</title>
		<link>http://productionadvice.co.uk/wrong-about-spotify/comment-page-1/#comment-1413</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 15:30:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://productionadvice.co.uk/?p=1505#comment-1413</guid>
		<description>It DOES sound better with normalization disabled. I&#039;m positive. I can&#039;t explain why, I&#039;m just convinced that it just is that way. Try some more double blind testing. Thx for an interesting blog post anyhow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It DOES sound better with normalization disabled. I&#8217;m positive. I can&#8217;t explain why, I&#8217;m just convinced that it just is that way. Try some more double blind testing. Thx for an interesting blog post anyhow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VIOZ</title>
		<link>http://productionadvice.co.uk/wrong-about-spotify/comment-page-1/#comment-1400</link>
		<dc:creator>VIOZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 21:21:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://productionadvice.co.uk/?p=1505#comment-1400</guid>
		<description>Hi. I once tried to make a compilation cd for myself and i wanted every track to sound at equal volume, so i used a &quot;replay gain&quot; application, i wrote down the values and then i used an audio editor to turn them down. The result was &quot;flat&quot;, &quot;lifeless&quot;, etc. sound; I guess it has to do with the 16-bit resolution. So my question is: does features like Spotify&#039;s &quot;Volume Normalization&quot; change the data of the file or just &quot;tells&quot; the player to turn them down or up? I&#039;m sorry that i am such an ignorant. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi. I once tried to make a compilation cd for myself and i wanted every track to sound at equal volume, so i used a &#8220;replay gain&#8221; application, i wrote down the values and then i used an audio editor to turn them down. The result was &#8220;flat&#8221;, &#8220;lifeless&#8221;, etc. sound; I guess it has to do with the 16-bit resolution. So my question is: does features like Spotify&#8217;s &#8220;Volume Normalization&#8221; change the data of the file or just &#8220;tells&#8221; the player to turn them down or up? I&#8217;m sorry that i am such an ignorant. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Served from: productionadvice.co.uk @ 2012-02-09 16:35:48 by W3 Total Cache -->
